HM Roofing Review for Wildfire-Resistant Fire-Rated Roofing

The research in brief

HM Roofing is a good, but not fully verified, fit for a Utah homeowner who needs a Class A fire-rated roof to satisfy wildfire-zone code or insurance requirements. Two of seven platforms named HM Roofing during the ranking stage (DeepSeek and Kimi), both at rank 4, giving it a 28.6% share of included platform responses. The strongest reason to consider it is its dedicated Utah wildland-urban interface (WUI) service, which markets documented Class A roof assemblies rather than Class A shingles alone, plus regional coverage across the Wasatch Front, Central Utah, and St. George. The main limitation is that the reviewed evidence is primarily company-owned marketing: ember-resistant venting integration, exact tested assembly listings, insurer acceptance, and total installed pricing are not publicly documented.

Research Snapshot

Why HM Roofing Qualified for This Study

Questions explored

• Is HM Roofing a good choice for wildfire-resistant fire-rated roofing in a Utah WUI zone?
• How many AI platforms named HM Roofing for wildfire-resistant fire-rated roofing?

HM Roofing qualified because it is one of the few contractors in the platform responses that markets a dedicated fire-resistant and WUI roofing service rather than generic roof replacement. Its own WUI page describes Class A assemblies, material options, Utah locations, insurance-related statements, and the absence of published system pricing ^[7]. The company identifies itself as a licensed Utah contractor headquartered in Utah County, serving the Wasatch Front, Central Utah, and the St. George area, with fire-resistant Class A/WUI systems among its listed services (official:C1).

The ranking-stage evidence is thin relative to the fit-research stage. Only two of seven platforms named HM Roofing during ranking discovery, both at rank 4, which is why the platform share is 28.6% rather than a broad consensus. All seven platforms evaluated fit, but platform mentions count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. That distinction matters: a "good" fit rating from several platforms does not mean those platforms ranked HM Roofing highly against competitors.

The company's stated credentials include a Utah DOPL license number and a DBA registration as HMCO LLC (Evidence ID perplexity:c11, official:C1). One platform noted a conflict: the site references both "HMCO LLC" and "R & D Bennett, L.L.C." as the parent company for the trade name HM Roofing, though both listings use the same DOPL license number (Gemini). Buyers should confirm the contracting entity before signing.

The service or product in focus

Questions explored

• Which HM Roofing service is most relevant for a homeowner who needs a Class A fire-rated roof assembly?
• Does HM Roofing install Class A asphalt, metal, and synthetic shake roof assemblies for Utah WUI zones?

The most relevant offering is HM Roofing's Class A Fire-Rated Roof Systems for the Utah Wildland-Urban Interface, described across platform responses as documented Class A asphalt, metal, and synthetic shake roof assemblies. The company states it installs the full tested assembly, not just the shingle, and lists Class A asphalt, standing-seam metal, and synthetic slate or shake options ^[7].

Named material paths in the reviewed sources include CeDUR synthetic cedar shake, Brava composite roof tile, and ProVia metal roofing ^[11]. HM Roofing's Brava page states that Class A fire-rated assemblies are available and that the company confirms the exact assembly with the city before installation ^[5]. Its replacement page lists asphalt, standing-seam metal, and synthetic slate or shake options with fire-resistant or Class A characteristics ^[9].

The distinction between a Class A shingle and a Class A assembly is central to this use case. Independent FEMA guidance states that fiberglass-reinforced asphalt shingles should have 5/8-inch gypsum roof board complying with ASTM C 1177 installed over wood decking for enhanced protection in Class A assemblies, and that wood shingles and shakes can be rated Class A only if fire-retardant-treated with specific cap sheet underlayment ^[19]. UC Agriculture and Natural Resources similarly notes that aluminum roof covering and fire-retardant-treated wood shake are assembly-rated Class A only with specific underlying materials ^[23]. HM Roofing's claim to install full tested assemblies is directionally aligned with that standard, but the reviewed pages do not publish the specific assembly models, UL listings, or ASTM reports.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions explored

• What do AI platforms agree HM Roofing offers for wildfire-resistant fire-rated roofing?
• Is HM Roofing's Utah WUI service territory a genuine advantage for wildfire-zone homeowners?

Platforms broadly agreed on four points. First, HM Roofing markets Class A or WUI roof systems specifically for Utah wildfire-risk settings ^[7]. Second, the company distinguishes a tested Class A assembly from a Class A shingle alone ^[7]. Third, it offers multiple fire-rated material categories, including asphalt, metal, and synthetic shake or slate ^[7]. Fourth, it advertises insurance-related assistance, including inspection documentation and help with non-renewal letters ^[3].

Regional targeting was also widely supported. HM Roofing identifies Utah County, the Wasatch Front, Central Utah, St. George, and several foothill or mountain communities as service areas, and specifically markets Utah WUI roofing ^[3]. One platform cited the company's stated 13 years in Utah and DOPL license number ^[3].

Independent code context supports the relevance of the category, not the company's specific performance. Utah statutory materials adopt the 2006 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code as a code local compliance agencies may adopt or amend ^[31], and the Utah WUI provisions address Class A roof coverings or assemblies, fire-stopping, and vent protection ^[32]. Utah residential code materials require listed Class A, B, or C roofing where required and reference UL 790 or ASTM E108 testing ^[30]. Independent journalism reported that some Utah jurisdictions now require Class A roofing in WUI zones under updated fire codes tied to HB 48 ^[26].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions explored

• Why did some AI platforms rate HM Roofing as uncertain rather than a good fit for wildfire-resistant roofing?
• Does HM Roofing document ember-resistant venting integration for Class A WUI assemblies?

Fit ratings diverged. Google rated HM Roofing "strong," calling it an outstanding choice for Utah homeowners facing wildfire compliance mandates or insurance pressures. OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok, and Perplexity rated it "good." DeepSeek and Kimi rated it "uncertain."

The uncertainty is concentrated in specific gaps rather than general doubt. DeepSeek's review found that the reviewed HM Roofing pages did not document a specific Class A fire-rated roof system offering, WUI code expertise, ember-resistant venting integration, or insurance-eligibility support, and concluded the company should be treated as a candidate to interview rather than a confirmed strong fit ^[3]. Kimi reported that the HM Roofing website was inaccessible during its research window, could not verify the ranking-stage product description, and recommended proven alternatives with published compliance paths ^[3].

Ember-resistant venting is the clearest unresolved item. OpenAI found that the reviewed WUI page discusses roof assemblies and eave-end fire-stopping but does not document a specific ember-resistant vent product, vent rating, mesh specification, or installation package ^[7]. Anthropic reached the same conclusion, noting the absence of any public reference to soffit screening specifications, gable vent protection, or intumescent systems ^[3]. Perplexity and Grok reported similar gaps ^[3]. Google noted that integration specifics for ember-resistant venting products are not explicitly detailed on product pages, though proper ventilation is mentioned.

Manufacturer certification is a second unresolved item. Anthropic found no public disclosure of GAF Master Elite, CertainTeed SELECT ShingleMaster, or Owens Corning Platinum Preferred certifications, which unlock 25-year manufacturer-backed workmanship coverage and are held by only 1-3% of U.S. contractors ^[27]. Google, by contrast, described HM Roofing as a factory-certified GAF contractor eligible for the GAF Silver Pledge Limited Warranty (official:C1). These are not necessarily contradictory - GAF certification tiers differ - but the specific tier is not established in the reviewed evidence.

A third conflict concerns treated wood shake. HM Roofing states "Utah County WUI compliant - no wood roofs in the interface" ^[3]. Anthropic noted that fire-retardant-treated wood shakes can legally achieve Class A by assembly in some WUI jurisdictions per FEMA and state codes, leaving unclear whether HM Roofing excludes treated shake entirely or only untreated wood ^[19].

Features for this home service need

Questions explored

• Which wildfire-resistant roofing capabilities does HM Roofing document, and which remain unverified?
• Does HM Roofing provide the Class A assembly documentation an insurer may require?

Capabilities fall into three tiers: documented, claimed, and unverified.

Documented in the reviewed sources: Utah licensing and insurance status (Evidence ID perplexity:c6, official:C1); a dedicated fire-resistant and WUI service page ^[7]; multiple fire-rated material categories including asphalt, metal, and synthetic shake ^[9]; free inspection with an itemized bid after assessment ^[3]; and a stated practice of confirming the exact assembly with the city before installation on at least the Brava composite tile path ^[5].

Claimed but not independently verified: that the company installs full tested Class A assemblies rather than shingles alone ^[3]; that fire-rated roofs help premiums and insurability ^[3]; that the company assists with insurance non-renewal and claims documentation ^[6]; and that Utah's 2026 wildfire map and HB48 affect risk scoring for roughly 60,000 high-risk structures ^[3]. OpenAI explicitly noted that the reviewed independent sources did not verify all company-specific statements about the map, insurer behavior, or the approximately 60,000 high-risk structures figure.

Unverified or absent: specific ember-resistant vent products, mesh specifications, or vent retrofit protocols ^[7]; published UL 790 or ASTM E108 listings for the exact proposed assemblies (Claude); product-by-product assembly numbers or manufacturer specifications on the reviewed WUI page ^[7]; and any independent evidence that a particular insurer will accept HM Roofing's documentation or reduce premiums ^[3].

For context on what a complete WUI hardening scope typically includes, independent sources describe ember-resistant vents ranging from $20 to $80 each depending on type and size, with a typical home's 10-15 vents costing $200 to $800 in materials ^[24]. Fire-resistant vents generally range from $40 to $100 or more per vent depending on size and design ^[2]. Best practices for WUI unvented attics include Class A fire-rated roofing materials such as metal, noncombustible tiles, or asphalt-fiberglass composition shingles ^[21]. Whether HM Roofing bundles any of this into its Class A scope is not documented in the reviewed sources.

Pricing, contracts, and ongoing costs

Questions explored

• How much does HM Roofing charge for a Class A wildfire-resistant roof, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
• What contract, warranty, and financing terms should a buyer confirm with HM Roofing before signing?

No public project price was found for HM Roofing's recommended Class A systems. Pricing confidence is low across every platform that addressed it. HM Roofing offers a free inspection or consultation and an itemized bid; material choice, roof size, pitch, layers, and scope determine the price ^[7]. The company states that metal and premium systems cost more upfront and last longer ^[3].

Regional cost benchmarks, which are not HM Roofing quotes, provide context. Utah market data cited by one platform lists Class A asphalt shingles at $2 to $3 per square foot in materials, metal roofing at $9 to $17 per square foot, and tiles at $12 to $21 per square foot ^[28]. The same source states that Class A fire-rated materials can provide 10% to 30% insurance discounts, or $200 to $1,200 per year, in Utah WUI zones, though that claim was rated partial support ^[28]. Another platform listed installed ranges of $3.50 to $5.50 per square foot for asphalt shingles, $8 to $14 for metal, and $7 to $12 for synthetic shakes, with WUI-compliant assemblies often at a premium due to additional underlayment and venting requirements (Kimi). These figures come from different sources and are not directly comparable.

Additional fees that are not itemized publicly include potential charges for tear-off, additional roof layers, decking repair, flashing, ventilation changes, gutters, solar coordination, and permits ^[7]. HM Roofing's terms state that all prices are subject to change without notice, that a detailed estimate is provided before work begins, and that scope changes may result in additional charges (official:C2). Payment is due upon completion unless otherwise agreed in writing, and the company accepts credit cards, checks, and financing options (official:C2).

Contract, cancellation, deposit, change-order, and workmanship-warranty terms were not verified in the reviewed sources ^[7]. HM Roofing advertises manufacturer warranty eligibility for certain GAF work, but the exact warranty, exclusions, registration requirements, and workmanship coverage for a proposed assembly must be confirmed (Evidence ID openai:hm-home, official:C1). Financing is advertised, but the lender, APR, term, payment, and eligibility are unclear ^[7]. One platform noted that typical roofing registrations must occur within 30 to 60 days of installation to validate manufacturer warranty (Claude).

Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who is HM Roofing best suited for in a wildfire-resistant fire-rated roofing project?
• Is HM Roofing a good fit for a Utah homeowner facing an insurance non-renewal over an old roof?

HM Roofing is best suited for Utah homeowners replacing a roof in or near a WUI area who need a documented Class A assembly rather than only a Class A shingle ^[7]. It also fits buyers choosing among asphalt, standing-seam metal, or synthetic shake appearance who want a local contractor with regional code familiarity ^[9].

It is a reasonable fit for homeowners in HB 48 high-risk zones such as Alpine, Highland, Draper foothills, Eagle Mountain benches, and the St. George area who need Class A roofing to meet code or insurance requirements ^[3]. It also suits homeowners combining a Class A roof replacement with insurance claim documentation and negotiation support, since the company advertises inspection documentation, insurance-claim assistance, and insurance cancellation help ^[3].

Properties with roofs 15 or more years old in high-risk wildfire zones requiring WUI-compliant material upgrades are another stated fit (Claude). Buyers who value a free inspection before committing to a bid may also find the process useful ^[3].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions explored

• Who should not choose HM Roofing for wildfire-resistant fire-rated roofing?
• Is HM Roofing suitable for a homeowner outside Utah who needs a Class A WUI roof?

Homeowners outside HM Roofing's verified Utah service territory should not choose it. The company serves the Wasatch Front, Central Utah, and the St. George area, and multiple platforms flagged geographic limitation as a disqualifier ^[3].

Buyers requiring a separately documented ember-resistant venting and whole-home WUI hardening package should look elsewhere or demand written scope confirmation, because the reviewed sources do not document a specific ember-resistant vent product or retrofit protocol ^[7].

Buyers needing a guaranteed insurance premium reduction or written insurer acceptance should not rely on HM Roofing's marketing claims, since no independent evidence was found that a particular insurer will accept the company's documentation or reduce premiums ^[3].

Projects requiring published, fixed pricing before an inspection are a poor match, because HM Roofing does not publish prices for its Class A systems and provides itemized bids only after inspection ^[7]. Buyers who prioritize verified top-tier manufacturer certifications before engaging a contractor should also verify first, since no public disclosure of GAF Master Elite, CertainTeed SELECT, or Owens Corning Platinum Preferred status was found ^[27].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions explored

• What is a better alternative to HM Roofing for a buyer who needs published Class A assembly documentation?
• When should a wildfire-zone homeowner choose a different contractor over HM Roofing?

Another contractor may be better when the buyer is outside Utah or outside HM Roofing's listed service territory ^[3]. Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Utah, Nevada, and Texas hill country jurisdictions have adopted similar WUI provisions for Class A roofing requirements, so out-of-state buyers need a contractor with local code familiarity ^[20].

A contractor with published assembly specifications, licensed fire or WUI design expertise, and documented ember-resistant venting installation is preferable when vent protection is a central requirement ^[7]. A contractor with established relationships or written acceptance criteria from the buyer's insurer is preferable when insurance renewal or eligibility is the primary objective ^[3].

A roofing company offering competitive, comparable itemized bids is preferable when price transparency and multiple independent quotes are required ^[7]. Buyers who need documented post-fire performance data or third-party wildfire resilience verification should note that no case studies or performance metrics were published by HM Roofing in the reviewed sources (Claude).

For buyers who want a verified product path independent of the installer, several manufacturers publish Class A documentation. CeDUR synthetic shakes are described as standalone Class A fire rated via ASTM E108 and UL 790, with an ICC evaluation report and California Building Code compliance including Fire Hazard Severity Zones ^[15]. DECRA steel panels are recognized as Class A roof coverings per IBC 1507.5 and ICC-ESR reports ^[1]. IKO PrevENt SBS cap sheets offer UL 790 and ULC S107M Class A ratings with graphite technology ^[16]. Polyglass Polyanchor XFR is a Class A fire-rated underlayment with ember resistance for WUI applications ^[14]. TAMKO asphalt shingles achieve Class A per UL 790 when installed per manufacturer instructions ^[17]. These are product-level references, not contractor recommendations, and a buyer would still need an installer qualified for the specific assembly.

Questions to ask before choosing a provider

Questions explored

• What should a buyer confirm with HM Roofing about the exact Class A assembly before signing a contract?
• How should a buyer verify HM Roofing's license, insurance, and warranty terms before work begins?

Ask which exact manufacturer, product, underlayment, deck, and installation combination is being proposed, and where its UL 790 or ASTM E108 Class A listing is documented ^[7]. Ask whether the proposal will identify the complete tested roof assembly, including underlayment, sheathing and deck assumptions, valleys, eaves, penetrations, and flashing ^[7].

Ask whether HM Roofing will inspect and upgrade attic, soffit, ridge, gable, and roof vents with specifically ember-resistant products, and what rating or mesh specification applies ^[7]. Ask whether the local building or fire official approves the exact assembly for the property's WUI classification and defensible-space condition ^[32].

Ask whether HM Roofing will provide permit drawings, product data sheets, listing reports, installation instructions, completion photos, and a final compliance letter ^[7]. Ask whether the buyer's insurer will confirm in writing that the proposed roof satisfies its underwriting or renewal requirement, and whether any premium change is guaranteed ^[3].

Ask for total installed costs, tear-off assumptions, decking allowances, permit fees, ventilation work, taxes, financing APR, and change-order terms (Evidence ID openai:hm-wui, official:C2). Ask what workmanship warranty applies, who provides it, and what exclusions apply to wildfire, ember, wind, hail, maintenance, and ventilation issues ^[3]. Ask whether HM Roofing's Utah DOPL license and insurance are current for the specific project location and scope (Evidence ID perplexity:c11, official:C1). Ask what maintenance or future alteration could invalidate the Class A assembly or manufacturer warranty ^[7].

The consensus assessment

HM Roofing is a good, but not fully verified, fit for a Utah homeowner seeking a Class A wildfire-resistant roof. Five of seven platforms rated it good or strong; two rated it uncertain. The strongest evidence is its dedicated Utah WUI service, stated use of documented Class A assemblies, regional coverage across Utah's highest wildfire-risk counties, and advertised insurance-documentation support. The weakest evidence concerns ember-resistant venting integration, published assembly listings, manufacturer certification tier, insurer acceptance, and total installed price.

The buyer should condition selection on written verification of the exact tested assembly, local code approval, ember-resistant venting scope, insurer acceptance, warranty terms, and total installed price. Platform agreement on these points does not prove product quality; it reflects what the reviewed sources say. For a broader view of how this contractor compares with others evaluated for the same use case, see the Wildfire resistant fire rated roofing consensus index. Buyers who want to compare additional providers across the same category can browse the roofing services directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: OpenAI (gpt-5.6-luna), Anthropic (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001), Google (gemini-3.5-flash), Grok (x-ai/grok-4.3), Perplexity (perplexity/sonar), DeepSeek (deepseek-v4-flash), and Kimi (moonshotai/kimi-k2.6). Each platform was asked which providers it would recommend for a homeowner in a wildfire risk zone who needs a fire-rated roof to meet insurance requirements or local defensible space codes. HM Roofing was named during the ranking stage by two of seven platforms, both at rank 4.

The study date is 2026-10-01. Platform-reported research dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. All included platforms evaluated fit, but platform mentions count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in this evidence set, so company claims are not described as independently verified.

Research limitations

Several limitations apply. DeepSeek's research date was 2026-06-12, which differs from the authoritative run date of 2026-10-01; its findings may predate later code or company changes. DeepSeek also ran without search enabled, so its conclusions rest on a narrower evidence base. Kimi reported that the HM Roofing website was inaccessible during its research window, which may reflect a temporary outage, domain change, or defunct site rather than a substantive finding.

The reviewed evidence is primarily HM Roofing's own marketing rather than independent performance or customer-outcome evidence. No public fixed pricing or representative installed-price range was found. No verified product-by-product assembly numbers, UL listings, ASTM reports, or manufacturer specifications were found on the reviewed WUI page. No clearly documented ember-resistant venting product or whole-roof vent retrofit protocol was found. No independent verification of insurer acceptance, premium discounts, or successful insurance eligibility outcomes was found.

Utah WUI rules and local amendments can vary by jurisdiction, hazard classification, defensible space, and project type, so the exact requirement must be confirmed with the local building or fire official. One platform noted that the broader web also surfaces other unrelated HM Roofing entities in other states, so the exact entity should be confirmed before contracting. Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing; buyers should verify each item directly.

See the broader Wildfire-Resistant Fire-Rated Roofing consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

1. ESR-1754 DECRA Roofing Systems: https://decra.com/hubfs/Code%20Compliance/ESR-1754-Nov-2024-Nov-2025.pdf
2. Firestorm Building Products - Fire Resistant Vents: https://firestormbuildingproducts.com/fire-resistant-vents/
3. Roof Replacement & Repair in Utah County | HM Roofing: https://hmroofs.com/
4. About Us - HM Roofing - Utah's Trusted Roofers: https://hmroofs.com/about-us/
5. Brava Composite Roof Tile - Utah's Trusted Roofers: https://hmroofs.com/brava-composite-roof-tile/
6. Roofing FAQs | HM Roofing - Utah County Answers: https://hmroofs.com/faq/
7. Fire-Resistant & WUI Roofing in Utah | HM Roofing: https://hmroofs.com/fire-resistant-roofing-wui/
8. Home - HM Roofing - Utah's Trusted Roofers: https://hmroofs.com/home/
9. Replacement: https://hmroofs.com/roof-replacement/
10. American Fork Roofing | HM Roofing - Replace, Repair, Claims: https://hmroofs.com/roofing-american-fork/
11. CeDUR Synthetic Cedar Shake | HM Roofing - Utah's Trusted Roofers: https://hmroofs.com/services/cedur-synthetic-cedar-shake/
12. ProVia Metal Roofing | HM Roofing - Utah's Trusted Roofers: https://hmroofs.com/services/provia-metal-roofing/
13. Utah Roofing License Check | HM Roofing - DOPL Lookup: https://hmroofs.com/utah-roofing-license/
14. Polyanchor XFR Fire Rated Underlayment 2025: https://polyglass.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2025-Polyanchor-XFR_web.pdf
15. Understanding ASTM E108: The Gold Standard for Fire-Resistant Roofing: https://www.cedur.com/astm-e108/
16. IKO PrevENt Fire Rated Roofing Systems: https://www.iko.com/comm/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2024/02/MM1L177_IKO_PrevENtFireRatedRoofingSystems_Brochure_EN.pdf
17. TAMKO Asphalt Shingles UL Evaluation Report ER2919-02: https://www.tamko.com/docs/default-source/certifications/tamko-asphalt-shingles-ul-evaluation-report-(er2919-02).pdf?sfvrsn=9aaf56a0_12
18. Official pricing and terms source: https://hmroofs.com/terms-and-conditions/

Independent Sources

19. FEMA - Home Builder's Guide to Construction in Wildfire Zones FS No. 5: https://defensiblespace.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/fema_p_737_fs_5.pdf
20. DG Floors - Class A Fire Rated Roof Ratings Explained: https://dgfloors.com/class-a-fire-rated-roof/
21. Fire Safe Marin - Fire-Resistant Vents: https://firesafemarin.org/harden-your-home/fire-resistant-vents/
22. ESR-2901 DECRA Roofing Systems: https://icc-es.org/wp-content/uploads/report-directory/ESR-2901.pdf
23. UC Agriculture and Natural Resources - Roof Covering: https://ucanr.edu/site/homeowners-wildfire-mitigation-guide/roof-covering
24. US Made Supply - Ember-Resistant Vent Guide: https://usmadesupply.com/resources/guides/ember-resistant-vent-guide
25. CeDUR Code Evaluation Report CER-US1025: https://www.arcat.com/certificates/cedur/CEDURQAICodeEvaluationReport-CER-us1025.pdf
26. Fox 13 Now - Is your home in Utah's high-risk wildfire zone?: https://www.fox13now.com/the-place/is-your-home-in-utahs-high-risk-wildfire-zone
27. Premium Roofing Corp - Which Roofing Certifications Matter: https://www.premiumroofingcorp.com/which-roofing-certifications-actually-matter-gaf-master-elite-vs-other-credentials/
28. Roofing Calc - Average Cost to Tear Off and Replace Roof in Utah: https://www.roofingcalc.com/average-cost-to-tear-off-replace-a-roof-in-utah/
29. Storm Forge Pro - GAF Master Elite, CertainTeed SELECT, Owens Corning Platinum: https://www.stormforgepro.com/blog/roofer-certifications-explained

Other Sources

30. Chapter 9 Roof Assemblies - 2021 Utah State Residential Code: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/UTRC2021P1/chapter-9-roof-assemblies
31. Utah Code Title 15A, Chapter 2, Section 103: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title15A/Chapter2/C15A-2-S103_2025070120250507.html
32. 2006 Utah Wildland-Urban Interface Code: https://www.utah.gov/pmn/files/828161.pdf